The Financial Planner’s Dilemma
When I meet a prospective client one of the first areas to be discussed is what financial products they currently hold. While many people will know that they have a mortgage and its broad details, less will know about what their pension fund and investments are applied to and even fewer again will know what level of life assurance they hold. Most people usually do not give time to, never mind arrange, either their Will or an Enduring Power of Attorney, two key personal legal issues especially if they have dependants. In fact, I know very few individuals that have everything properly organised both financially and legally.
In truth, most people put more energy and thought into planning their summer holidays than they do into protecting their own and their family's future. The protection that gets the most attention is that which is foisted upon people, namely motor insurance because it is a legal requirement as well as house insurance and mortgage protection cover because of their necessity to be in place before drawing down a mortgage.
Why is it then that most people are so complacent on these extremely important matters?
From experience I know it is usually because they assume that they have sufficient coverage of financial planning issues with existing products and presume because they have either or both a pension or investment product or even set up life assurance that they have properly organised. In other cases, it is because they have never really bothered to educate themselves in financial matters and behave ostrich like ignoring the potential problems hoping that they will disappear.
When you analyse a new client's various financial products it usually becomes apparent that they have accumulated such products through a succession of financial advisers, all usually consulted for a particular purpose only, be it investment, pension, mortgage or life assurance. The hotchpotch of financial product is a natural consequence of all of this. If you approach matters in a disjointed manner, you get a disjointed portfolio!
If you recognise yourself in this, what's the solution?
Firstly gather up all the data that you have on your personal affairs and make a list of personal spending, insurance cover, mortgages, pensions and investments. Lists are very powerful as they focus our attention, quite often, on matters that we have long forgotten about. Check the last few months’ bank statements and credit cards and you will be surprised at how easily expenses accumulate. Most people use ATMs and the spending from the cash is usually the most difficult to pin down. This might mean that you will have to monitor expenses going forward for the next few months.
For investments, pensions and life assurance get a copy of the summary schedule or ask for the insurance company or the investment company to send you recently updated details.
Next, give some serious thought as to what is important to you and your family - now and in the future. Is it school or university fees, a second home in sunnier climes, paying down the mortgage, taking long term care of a disabled child or sibling, having a decent retirement fund or all of the above and more? This second exercise might take several weeks as many people rarely give sufficient thought to what their purpose in life is!
When all is done, approach a financial planner and ask them to analyse your portfolio of products in terms of liquidity, risk, debt, savings and solvency. These are key to not only understanding your current state of affairs but also how you can start to plan your financial future. A full list of Certified Financial Planners is available on www.fpsb.ie
A financial planner should be able to analyse the key elements of your holdings and advise on the relative strength or weakness of your financial portfolio and how it is affecting your life now. Likewise the financial planner will also be able to identify the effects of current spending patterns and whether possible future needs might be met. These needs may involve anticipating future cashflows, tax computations and required rate of investment return.
Historically, very few advisers in Ireland have built this broad approach into their actual client interaction. This is because very few clients understand the need for such full root and branch reviews as they have been educated by the financial services industry to react to problems by buying financial product rather than anticipating them in a constructive manner and then identifying the optimal strategy.
The one good thing that has come from the demise of the Celtic Tiger is that there is now a realisation that there is no free lunch as well as the cause and effect of poor financial planning. Rather than look backwards, perhaps now is the time to look forward and start taking charge of your own financial future.
Today is a good day to start.
Why The Pension Levy Is Shortsighted & Unfair
At this stage most self employed people know that as part of the Government's initiative to promote job creation, a 0.6% levy has been introduced on personal pension funds. The levy is being applied on all capital value assets under management of funded pension schemes and personal pension plans established in Ireland. Thankfully it is not applied on Approved Retirement Funds of those who have retired.
The levy has been stated by the Government to be temporary, and will be in force until 2014, thereby hoping to raise an estimated €470m annually.
Before we go any further, let's not deal in semantics. This is not a levy - this is a TAX to add to all of the other taxes that the Government finds that it has to implement because of past transgressions.
While the market has been advised that the TAX will apply based on the market value of assets as at 1st January 2011 there has been very little specific detail from the Department of Finance on the practicalities of the proposal. Whether the TAX will be introduced before and, if so, continue after 2014, time will tell but its very existence points to a very basic lack of understanding on the Government's approach to retirement funding.
Firstly the long term timebomb of the need to have adequate retirement funding for our aging population just started to tick louder. By taxing pension funds by a further 0.6% a personal pension fund will be reduced by 6.2% over a ten year period or 12.7% over a 20 year period. If the eventual fund was originally likely to be €1,000,000 this would account to a reduction of €62,000 or €127,000 over time, depending on your term. These reductions, based on current annuity rates of, say, 4.5% will see a loss in annual income from retirement age onwards of €2,790 or €5,715.
This is all the more incredible when one considers that up to even last year, the previous Government had stated that they sought to ensure that all employers have some form of compulsory pension scheme in place. While a different Government is in place now, the same problem remains and has been exasperated by the raiding of the National Pension Reserve Fund just to help bail out the banks. One can only hope that when the banks become permanently solvent that they will be capable of being sold on by the State for a considerable profit and thus recharge the National Pension Reserve Fund.
The application of the levy/tax is also unfair on the private sector. If one assumes an annuity rate of 4.5%, the o.6% levy represents a 13% reduction in annual income being absorbed by the private pension holders.
This is a one sided tax as no equivalent charge is being placed on public setor pensions which, if it was, would have resulted in a 13% reduction in gross monthly pension payments. I don't imagine that too many public servants would stand idly by for a 13% reduction in retirement income.
At its heart is a totally inequitable position which is fundamentally unconstitutional. Why is one sector of Irish life being penalised directly without the other side having to take any pain?
Within the pensions industry, even in the last few short days, there is a growing voice for legal action by way of a test case to be taken. Time and many actuaries and lawyers later will tell if the Government really knows how to handle this problem of their own making!
